For sometime now, the little corner of the blogsphere that writes about enterprise software has been going on about Enterprise 2.0, either in defence of its wikipedia status, or discussing what it “means.” Dion Hinchcliffe provides a useful summary of enterprise 2.0 here. I’ve written about it too, as have most of the irregulars.
Putting the wikipedia stuff aside, there are two camps, one that thinks the term should be narrow, and another camp that thinks it should be broad. For the sake of simplicity I label them Camp V and Camp A. If I have placed anyone in the wrong camp, apologies.
Camp A: (McAfee, Boothby, Mayfield+others)
Enterprise 2.0 is the use of emergent social software platforms within companies, or between companies and their partners or customers
Camp V:(Mirchandani , Rangaswami, +others)
Enterprise 2.0 is the synergy of a new set of technologies, development models and delivery methods that are used to develop business software and deliver it to users.
The English language is bountiful, dynamic and often beautiful. It has no committees like French has, deciding which words are allowed.
I wonder why we can’t think of two terms, one to describe the use of emergent software in an enterprise software, and the other to describe a broader shift in Enterprise technology.
I could understand it if the argument was over a really fabulous word, like cyberspace, or the Internet.
The car isn’t called horse 2.0.
The lightbulb isn’t called candle 2.0
Fax (Facsimile) isn’t called letter 2.0
If we are so innovative in the 21st century, the least we can do is to think of some new terms that inspire. Think ROBOT, Television, Velcro, Radio, even scuba (Self-Contained Underwater-Breathing Apparatus)
I propose that we bury the term, and boycott all use of 2.0 from now on (well after the office 2.0 event)
If this stuff is really that innovative then it deserves a proper word. (I’ll save my rant on dropping vowels for latr) Dust off those thinking caps, and like inventors of yore, come up with something that one day we could use in a scrabble game.
Technorati tags 2.0 Enterprise2.0
10 thoughts on “A rant about suffixes, especially numeric ones with decimal points.”
The Mustang was a very succesful Car -)
Nice post, Thomas! I like the attitude.
p.s. I thought about you a lot as I cheered my friend on at the Ironman this weekend. Lots of bikes with expensive components. What an incredible event. You ever think about one of those?
I’ll be the first to vote for a new term. How about Emergence Technology? Or Emergence Software?
I would also like to draw your attention to Ham Sandwich 2.0 complete with reflective surface!
very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
How about “Renaisance II” (of the Mainframe) since, in many ways, that is what it is!(IBM rebadged their big blue machines as “Enterprise Systems” when PC’s came along making them “Legacy” systems. An Enterprise (web) server is just another glorified name for a mainframe no matter how many blades it has! If broadband had been around in the 80s and early 90s, the PC revolution might never have emerged.